Silence- the saga of the final teaching
Unlike fanatic faiths that stone, burn, or kill for asking questions, Hinduism has always welcomed them — both the harshest and the silliest alike.
Where others suppress curiosity, this tradition sanctifies it.
It recognises that a question must be met with a word, not a sword.
And so, Hinduism has become an ever-growing library of questions and answers — of vฤda, vivฤda, and samvฤda — debate, discourse, and dialogue.
To silence the questioner is a tฤmasic, asuric act — a form of suppression. To answer endlessly is rฤjasic — expression that fuels yet more questions, keeping the mind alive in restless seeking. But to fall silent in understanding — dhyฤna-mauna — is sฤttvika: neither suppression nor expression, but transcendence itself.
Chinmayananda and Tapovan
When disciples once asked Swami Chinmayananda to speak about his guru, Swami Tapovan Maharaj, he laughed and said, “What a ridiculous question! Haven’t you learnt Vedฤnta? Can Brahman ever be expounded?” Some truths can only be pointed to by silence.
Ramana Maharshi and Ganapati Muni
Ganapati Muni, erudite scholar of Vedas, Purฤแนas, and Tantras, approached Ramana Maharshi seeking “something beyond knowledge.”
He poured out theories and crafted intricate questions. Ramana merely said, “Summa irru” — “Be still.” In that stillness, all answers dissolved.
J. Krishnamurti
“When you watch attentively, with diligence, there is nothing to learn,” said Krishnamurti. “There is only that vast space, silence, and emptiness — which is all-consuming energy.” Learning ends where silence begins.
Anandamayฤซ Mฤ and Paramahansa Yogananda
When Paramahansa Yogananda once asked A nandamayฤซ Mฤ to “teach” him or speak about herself, she smiled gently and said, “There is very little to tell.” That smile was her Upaniแนฃad.
Chandrashekhara Bharati
A disciple of Jagadguru Chandrashekhara Bharati once requested him to describe his experiences in meditation. The Acharya replied, “What shall I speak of? Chit cannot be described. Jada is not worthy of words.” He who knows does not speak.
He who speaks does not know.
Akka Mahadevi and Allama Prabhu
At the Anubhava Maแนแธapa, the fiery mystic Akka Mahadevi once debated Allama Prabhu.
Their exchange soared into abstruse heights — Nirguแนa Brahman, avyakta upฤsanฤ. Finally, Akka smiled and said softly, “I bow to all who can dissect philosophy so sharply.
But my beloved Lord Chennamallikarjuna is averse to words. I shall speak no more — and be a fool.”
In surrender, she won the argument.
Lalleshwari (Lal Ded)
The Kashmiri mystic Lalleshwari served her silent guru faithfully for years. One day she implored, “Teach me!” He looked at her and said only, “Be as you are.” That single sentence shattered her ignorance. She left, naked and fearless, roaming the valleys of Kashmir in divine intoxication — speaking rarely, but each word a thunderbolt.
Sadฤลiva Brahmendra
Sadฤลiva Brahmendra, a prodigious debater and philosopher, once returned to his guru flushed with intellectual victories. The guru, furious, said, “Is this knowledge meant for debate? Just shut up!”
The words pierced like lightning. Sadฤลiva dropped all argumentation, renounced speech, and wandered like a mad saint — drunk on silence, the very image of an Avadhลซta.
The Buddha and the Four Paradoxes
A group of monks once asked the Buddha about the ultimate paradoxes of existence — Is the world eternal or transient? Is the soul one with the body or apart? They multiplied their questions — four became eight, then sixteen. Buddha replied to none. Later he said,
“Such unanswerable questions are acinteya — beyond thought. To brood over them brings only madness and vexation.” His silence was the clearest answer.
Parashurama and Dattatreya
After slaying the arrogant kings of the earth, Parashurama was still haunted by guilt.
He sought expiation and wisdom — and went to Dattatreya expecting an austere sage.
Instead, he found a naked mystic, eyes red with wine, his mother seated on his lap, surrounded by dogs. Dattatreya uttered not a word.
That shocking silence — the gaze of a mad god — dissolved Parashurama’s torment. From that mauna, the Tripura Rahasya was born.
Devฤซ and Himฤlaya
In the Devฤซ Gฤซtฤ, Himฤlaya questions the Goddess — her nature, her purpose, her form.
She interrupts gently: “Where can words or concepts even touch me? When world-destroying Asuras could not lay a finger on me, will you grasp me through speech?
Be silent — and perhaps you will know.”
Dakแนฃiแนฤmลซrti and the Seven แนแนฃis
The seven great sages, after millennia of tapas, reached a dead end in knowledge. They approached Dakแนฃiแนฤmลซrti, the primal Guru.
He sat motionless, unmoved by their words.
They waited, watching. He raised a hand — the Jรฑฤna Mudrฤ. At once, all doubts vanished — not answered, but slain. They bowed, and dispersed across the seven continents, carrying the unspoken teaching.
Nandi and ลiva
Finally came Nandi, seeking direct realisation of Brahmavidyฤ from his Master, ลiva. But ลiva sat in deep samฤdhi — eyes still, breath stilled, heartbeat gone. He neither spoke nor gestured.
Nandi waited. And waited. And waited still.
In that waiting — alert, wakeful, without expectation — he was transformed.
ลiva did not speak, did not smile, did not even say “Be still.” He simply was. And Nandi, reflecting that silence, became ฤnanda — the Blissful One.
The tradition of Sanฤtana Dharma does not fear questions. It dignifies them. But the ultimate teaching lies beyond words. In the silence of Dakแนฃiแนฤmลซrti, in the stillness of Ramana, in the smile of Mฤ, and in the waiting of Nandi —
there the truth resides. For the final answer is not spoken — it is realised.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Share your thoughts with us! You are most certainly free to disagree!